RESPONSE OF TRAINING SYSTEM PLANTING DENSITY AND CULTIVAR IN PEAR

S. Musacchi, V. Ancarani, A. Gamberini, M. Gaddoni, M. Grandi, S. Sansavini
High density planting in pear is expanding due to the widespread use of quince rootstock able to reduce tree size and induce early bearing. However, high density planting introduces high costs so the break-even point occurs 8 to 10 years after planting. The combination of high-density planting and compact tree architecture is fundamental to achieve success. In 1997, the University of Bologna, started a trial to compare and evaluate production and economic aspects of seven types of pear plantations (involving cultivars, density and training systems). There were three cultivars (‘Abbé Fétel’, ‘Conference’ and ‘Doyenné du Comice’), two quince rootstocks clones (‘MC’ and ‘Sydo’), and four planting densities [7936 trees/ha (VHDP), 5555 trees/ha (HDP), 3968 trees/ha (MDP) and 1984 trees/ha (LDP)]. The training systems were vertical axis/MC for VHDP, V-shape/MC for MDP and HDP, slender spindle and drapeau/‘MC’ for MDP, and slender spindle and drapeau/‘Sydo’ for LDP. The most productive results were obtained with ‘Abbé Fetel’ with the vertical axis/‘MC’ (VHDP) and the V-shape at HDP. After seven years the cumulative production was 32 kg/tree and 47 kg/tree, 257 t/ha and 262 t/ha, respectively. With ‘Conference’ the same 2 training systems performed similarly with a cumulative yield of 179 t/ha and 181 t/ha. In ‘Doyenné du Comice’ with the vertical axis/‘MC’ (VHDP), the accumulated yield was 132 t/ha followed by V-shape/MC for MDP with 120 t/ha. It must be stressed that the investments required by VHDP layouts requires high farm-gate prices for equitable returns to growers. This means that, in Italy, if the farm-gate price is lower than 0.45 €/kg, the break-even point is at least ten years and enterprise is at risk.
Musacchi, S., Ancarani, V., Gamberini, A., Gaddoni, M., Grandi, M. and Sansavini, S. (2005). RESPONSE OF TRAINING SYSTEM PLANTING DENSITY AND CULTIVAR IN PEAR. Acta Hortic. 671, 463-469
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.671.65
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.671.65
Pyrus communis, Cydonia oblonga, orchard design, pruning
English

Acta Horticulturae